Home / Publications /
Global Justice Center’s suggestions and comments regarding the National Election Bill of South Sudan
07.26.2016
Global Justice Center’s suggestions and comments regarding the National Election Bill of South Sudan
Topic | Article | Issues/Comments |
The Commission | Art. 8 (1)[…] “Selection of the Commission Members shall take into consideration consultations with women and civil society groups and include representation of these groups.” | Suggest including a concrete procedure for these consultations to guarantee the participation of women groups in the selection process. |
Art. 8 (1) “The Commission shall be compromised of nine members to be selected and appointed by the President in accordance with article 197 (3) of the Transitional Constitution” | Insert “ at least 3 of the members appointed should be women” | |
National Legislative Assembly: Number of women representatives | Art 35 (2) (b) The National Legislative Assembly shall be composed of members elected as follows… twenty five percent of women members shall be elected on the basis of proportional representation at the national level from closed party lists; | Change the 25% to 35%. CEDAW General Recommendation #23 on Article 7 (Political and Public life) suggests that the “number” should ideally be at 30-35%. “Research demonstrates that if women’s participation reaches 30 to 35 per cent (generally termed a “critical mass”) there is a real impact on political style and the content of decisions, and political life is revitalized. |
Related Publications
Legal Filings
10.22.2024
Amicus Brief — United States v. Idaho (October 2024)
Idaho’s “Defense of Life Act” (“Act” or “Idaho’s Law”), a near-total abortion ban, restricts access to necessary emergency reproductive healthcare, exacerbating preventable maternal mortality and morbidity and otherwise negatively impacting pregnant people. The law’s narrow exception for life-saving care will not prevent or mitigate these harms and will leave patients without access to emergency reproductive healthcare. The United States has ratified several human rights treaties that require it to guarantee access to safe and legal reproductive health services, in particular in emergencies or acute medical crises governed by the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (“EMTALA”). Under these treaties, the U.S. is required to respect, protect and fulfil the rights to life; freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment; non-discrimination; and privacy. Idaho’s draconian abortion law fails to respect these rights and violates the U.S.’s treaty obligations. This violation of the U.S.’s treaty obligations militates in favor of affirming the preliminary injunction issued by the District Court. Causing the U.S. to violate its international obligations will result in irreparable harm and is not in the public interest.
Read more
UN/Government Submissions
06.13.2024
Statement: US House Hearing on Liberia War Crimes Court
Advocacy Resources
10.30.2023
In Geneva, United States Dodges Key Questions on its Abortion Rights Record
On October 17-18 in Geneva, the United States government faced questions from civil society and the Human Rights Committee on the country’s compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). In addition to questions on immigrants’ rights, racial discrimination, and more, US officials were pressed repeatedly on the state of abortion access in the wake of the US Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.
Read more
Fact Sheets
10.17.2023
How the Dobbs Ruling Put the United States in Violation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Abortion
Human Rights Council
Human Rights Treaties
Reproductive Rights
United States
US Abortion Laws
The June 2022 Supreme Court decision Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization eliminated federal constitutional protection for access to abortion in the United States. Following Dobbs, more than a dozen states fully banned abortion, and many others passed or proposed increased restrictions. On October 17-18, 2023, the Human Rights Committee will review US compliance with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), including the impact of Dobbs on its human rights obligations.
Read more
UN/Government Submissions
09.20.2023
Report to Human Rights Committee on US Abortion Bans as Violations of International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Letters
04.19.2023
Coalition Letter to the White House and State Department on the US Periodic Report to the UN Human Rights Committee Under The ICCPR
The undersigned organizations call on the Biden administration to update the United States’ fifth periodic report to the UN Human Rights Committee under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The Committee will be basing its review on this report, which was submitted by the Trump administration on January 15, 2021. This report version lacks updates on existing U.S. policies, as well as a commitment to expand protections for marginalized communities, especially non-citizens, in the context of reproductive health and access to medical care. It is critical — and consistent with the Biden administration’s policy commitments — to address the gaps between current U.S. policies and the ICCPR.
Read more
Briefs and White Papers
04.18.2023
Human Rights Crisis: Abortion in the United States After Dobbs
Letters
10.21.2022